Bulgarian Coal Magnate’s Plants May Have Saved Around 30M Euros by Under-Declaring Emissions
OCCRP analysis shows two power stations associated with Hristo Kovachki have reported strangely low emissions figures for the past three years.
For years, Marian Kočner was one of the most wealthy and powerful businessmen in Slovakia, a man whose connections with judges and prosecutors made him virtually untouchable, and whose extravagance made him a frequent fixture in local tabloids. Today, the middle-aged businessman’s craggy face and prominent shock of black hair are mostly seen in dispatches from the courtroom he sits in day after day.
Kočner is the main defendant in a high-profile trial that has gripped the country since December. He is charged with ordering the brutal murder of a young investigative journalist who had been reporting on corrupt Slovak politicians, Italian mafiosi — and Kočner himself.
The journalist, 27-year-old Ján Kuciak, was shot in his home along with his fiancee, Martina Kušnírová, by an armed assailant who has since confessed to the killing. The shocking double murder made headlines round the globe in February 2018. In Slovakia, it drove tens of thousands into the streets in cities across the country to demand an independent investigation.
As the official inquiry began to seem increasingly inadequate, riddled with apparent misdirections and even outright deception, demands for change grew. Many Slovakians called for new leaders who would do the young man justice. In due course they had them. First the interior minister, then the prime minister, and finally a widely criticized police chief resigned one after the other.
By September 2018, the once moribund investigation showed new signs of life. Four co-conspirators, including the murderer himself, were taken into custody. Prosecutors soon charged Kočner, now 56, with organizing the killing, and he was formally indicted along with the others in October 2019.
Nearly a hundred journalists from around the world have registered to cover his trial, and the latest developments are regularly broadcast on Slovakia’s main television channels. One-time allies now disavow the well-connected businessman. Kočner’s own brother told a reporter that he was considering changing his name, should Kočner be found guilty.
But the trial is shedding light on more than the murder of a journalist. A massive trove of data collected by police during the investigation, including files from Kočner’s phones and personal computer, has been made available to OCCRP journalists. The data not only reveals that Kuciak and his fiancée were murdered in cold blood for 50,000 euros, but also shows how Kočner has kept himself above the law by oiling the justice system of Slovakia’s fragile young democracy with cash and kompromat.
For over 20 years, the controversial businessman was widely suspected of multiple financial crimes, including VAT fraud, forging promissory notes, and even taking over a popular independent TV station. Though police opened investigations into some of these cases, and the evidence of his crimes was publicly available and overwhelming, Kočner was never successfully prosecuted.
The data obtained by reporters shows how he got away with it for so long: Blackmail, corruption, and personal connections with pliant prosecutors, judges, and well-placed insiders. His success paints an unflattering picture of the justice system in a country that has often been touted as a poster child for successful transition from communist rule to European rule of law.
A Kočner lawyer did not comment for this story, questioning reporters’ credentials. Another said he no longer represented the businessman, and a third could not be reached for comment.
Marian Kočner grew up in the small northern Slovakian town of Ružomberok. Ironically, he began his career as a journalist, graduating from Bratislava’s Comenius University and working as a television reporter for a state broadcaster.
But his media career wouldn’t last. With the crumbling of communism in Central Europe in the late ’80s, Slovakia began a painful transition away from a centralized economy that had been in place since 1948. As in the other former Eastern Bloc states, the country’s society and political system struggled to adapt.
Crime began to rise as a fragile new legal regime, staffed with inexperienced prosecutors and judges, found itself unable to cope. In the new private sector, there were opportunities to make money in both scrupulous and unscrupulous ways.
It was in this context that Kočner first entered the public eye in the late ‘90s, no longer as a journalist but as a businessman. Though initially known only as a side player in a major financial fraud, the so-called “Technopol case,” the scandals in which he was allegedly involved continued to mount over the following decades, making him a notorious figure (see boxes).
The First Technopol Case (1992-1995)
The original “Technopol case” was a murky scheme in which well-connected insiders allegedly defrauded a Slovak textile company, Technopol, of $2.3 million in a phony import deal.
German police, who were investigating the cross-border case, suspected that Kočner and a co-conspirator — Michal Kováč, Jr., the son of Slovakia’s president at the time, Michal Kováč — were behind the scam. An international arrest warrant was issued in 1994.
Subsequent developments in the remarkable case were emblematic of the political chaos of post-Communist Slovakia — and ensured that Kočner’s participation would draw comparatively little notice.
On Aug. 31, 1995, the president’s son was kidnapped — reportedly by Slovak security services — driven across the border into Austria, and left in front of a police station, stuffed in the trunk of a car. The heist, some Slovakian journalists speculated, had been ordered by then-Prime Minister Vladimír Mečiar, a fierce political opponent of the president. Mečiar denied that the security agency, which were believed to be linked to him, were involved.
Austrian authorities reportedly declined to extradite the younger Kováč to Germany, and he was soon back in Bratislava.
None of those involved faced legal sanction. In July 1996, President Kováč granted amnesty to Kočner and another suspect in the Technopol case. He later did the same for his son, and the investigation in Germany was also closed, according to the Slovak Spectator.
The TV Takeover (1998)
Kočner emerged in the public eye in 1998, when he went after Slovakia’s first private television channel.
The station, TV Markiza, had grown popular not only because it aired soap operas and Hollywood films, but also because it openly opposed Prime Minister Mečiar’s unpopular and increasingly autocratic government.
Under murky circumstances, Kočner managed to obtain a financial claim against the station. On Aug. 18, 1998, in the middle of a broadcast, the businessman showed up with a squad of private guards (some with alleged mafia connections) to physically take control of the building.
The scene unfolded just weeks before a parliamentary election, leading some to assume that Kočner had been dispatched by then Prime Minister Mečiar. A large crowd gathered near the building in northern Bratislava, determined to defend their favorite channel.
In fact, Mečiar has never been conclusively linked to the incident.
Kočner’s claim enabled him to argue successfully in court that he should be granted an ownership share of the station. Two years later, he reached an agreement with the other TV Markiza shareholders to sell them his shares. The exact amount he received was never made public.
The Mafia Lists (2005, 2011)
Kočner’s name appeared on two so-called "mafia lists," a set of internal police files leaked to the press in 2005 and 2011. While the first document listed him merely as the owner of two expensive cars, the second included him among a number of people suspected of involvement in organized crime. The lists, police later said, had been intended as an aid to officers investigating the mafia. Kočner has denied the authenticity of these lists.
The Donovaly case, involving a well-known Slovakian ski resort not far from Kočner’s hometown, was thoroughly covered by Kuciak in his investigative reporting. The resort is known as a meeting place for many of Slovakia’s elites. Unsurprisingly, Kočner left his mark there. He has owned several apartments and a small hotel in the resort and later built a luxurious new hotel, the Residence Hotel & Club.
The National Criminal Agency (NAKA) accused Kočner of tax fraud in the case, alleging that he used these hotels to obtain millions of euros through a fraudulent tax return by reselling them repeatedly to his own shell companies.
In his reporting, Kuciak found numerous procedural mistakes made by a NAKA investigator during the agency’s probe into the matter. The investigator was later removed from the case, which was reopened in August 2017 thanks to Kuciak’s reporting. The investigator was later called before a disciplinary committee and left the police force.
Glance House (2010)
Glance House is a partially completed apartment building in Bernolákovo, a village outside Bratislava, over which a lawsuit erupted in 2010.
As reported by [business publication Trend.sk, one of the two owners of the property accused the other of defrauding her. Because of the ongoing case, the Prosecutor’s Office froze any further action on the property, preventing tenants who had already paid their deposits from moving in.
Despite the block, Dobroslav Trnka, Slovakia’s prosecutor general at the time and a Kočner ally (see below), reportedly allowed the land on which the building stood to be transferred to firms affiliated with Kočner, under unclear circumstances. To this day, none of the buyers of apartments in the building have been able to gain access to their property.
The Welten Golf Course (2011)
The Welten golf course near the town of Báč, just outside Bratislava, was among Kočner’s frequent meeting spots. According to witness testimony, this was where he met with one of his most loyal associates to hand over the money to pay Kuciak’s murderer and his accomplice.
Kočner has been charged for illegally wresting ownership of both the course and the company that controlled it from its owner in 2011 through a complicated mechanism involving a debt obligation he had obtained.
The criminal case is ongoing.
Initially, Kočner denied owning the property, only to reveal later that he planned to invest millions into its development.
The Second Technopol Case (2017)
The second Technopol case, which is not connected to the earlier scandal from the ‘90s, was revealed to the public by Kuciak’s reporting just a year before his murder.
The case began with a marriage gone wrong. Denisa Pávková, Technopol’s board chairman, went behind the back of her estranged husband, the company’s owner, to sign away its shares and many of its valuable assets. She has been charged in the matter, and the case is ongoing.
According to data obtained by OCCRP from the police investigation, Kočner was in touch with Pávková at the time and was helping coordinate her legal strategy.
At least some of the assets stolen from the company reportedly ended up in the hands of Kočner’s allies. Moreover, shortly after the asset theft, Technopol paid half a million euros into Kočner’s personal account, according to multiple outlets.
The Markiza Promissory Notes (2017 - today)
The so-called “second TV Markiza case” was related to Kočner’s earlier claim against the station. Nearly 20 years after the previous settlement, Kočner made a new claim: that he possessed four promissory notes worth nearly 70 million euros allegedly signed by the station’s former owner, Pavol Rusko. Now Kočner was demanding payment. However, according to testimony from expert witnesses in a subsequent court case, the notes were forgeries.
It was on the basis of this case that Kočner was arrested and detained in 2018, as the Kuciak murder investigation was gaining steam. Both Kočner and Rusko face up to 20 years in prison for financial fraud and obstruction of justice.
Five Star Residence/VAT fraud (2011)
As reported by multiple Slovakian media outlets, police investigators found in 2018 that 17 flats in an elite downtown Bratislava building, the Five Star Residence, had been sold by one Kočner company to another for just one euro seven years earlier. The businessman allegedly used this transaction to file a fraudulent VAT refund claim on the sale. Kočner was not formally charged in the case, which Kuciak reported onm until after the journalist’s murder.
Over the same period, Kočner also began to appear in Slovakian celebrity magazines, where he was portrayed as a vain businessman who enjoyed flaunting his wealth. He was depicted driving a white Bentley around Bratislava, parking in spaces for the disabled as a display of his untouchability, and showering powerful officials with luxury handbags, watches, and other expensive gifts. The tabloids also reported that Kočner, whose nickname was “The Belly,” had gastric bypass surgery to lose weight.
Much more serious were the measures Kočner appears to have taken to ensure he would never face serious scrutiny for his alleged crimes.
In 2004, Dobroslav Trnka, then a deputy prosecutor general, was elected by parliament to the position of prosecutor general, giving him wide latitude to set the direction and scope of criminal investigations in the country.
The newly obtained police data makes it clear that Trnka — whom Kočner referred to familiarly as “Dobroš” — was a close ally of the controversial businessman.
In a recorded telephone conversation, Kočner reiterates to Trnka that he had Kočner to thank for at least some of the parliamentary votes in his favor during his 2011 reelection attempt, when he fell just one vote short.
In the 70-minute-long recording, the businessman upbraids the former prosecutor general for allegedly making a copy of a secret police file known as the “Gorilla Case” (see box) and using it to blackmail a businessman involved.
Kočner and Trnka’s discussion, which took place in 2014, centers on a major corruption scandal that had erupted a few years earlier after a secret police file, purportedly based on wiretaps made in a Bratislava apartment, appeared on the internet. The affair became known as the “Gorilla Case” after the police code name for the operation.
The file reveals that a group of high-profile politicians had met with top managers from Penta Investments, a major investment group. They are quoted discussing procurement and privatization contracts and associated kickbacks. The document, which led to protests in Bratislava, highlighted the tight collusion between Slovakia’s political and business elites.
Trnka, then prosecutor general, claimed that the transcript was not authentic. Its authenticity was also vociferously challenged by both Penta and the officials in question. And indeed, it was not known at the time whether the original audio of the wiretaps really existed.
In fact, the data obtained by OCCRP from the murder investigation confirms for the first time not only that the document was authentic, but that Kočner had a copy of the original audio recording on which it was based — and had even given it to Trnka for safekeeping. During a search of Kočner’s house, police officers discovered the audio file on an encrypted USB stick hidden in a box along with a commemorative medal for the Slovak Information Service. This was the first time the Gorilla Case transcript had been backed up by solid evidence.
“Why did you go and blackmail Haščák [a businessman who figures in the Gorilla Case]?” Kočner demands to know. “You fucking know he’s my friend. Fuck, do you know he is a man who, apart from other things, helped to fucking bribe the MPs when you were about to be [reelected as] prosecutor general?”
“Unfortunately we were one [vote] short,” Kočner continues. “But he was the one who deposited money and gave a million euros on your behalf. Exactly the same way I gave a million myself. The fact that we were one vote short, fuck, is not my fault.”
Trnka protests that he had not made a copy of the file and had not used it to blackmail anyone.
In response, Kočner continues to berate Trnka, demanding that he tell the truth about the audio and threatening him with retribution: “Only the truth will save you, and perhaps your son,” he says. “Because if you screw up … you’ll go to jail, and your son’s life will be ruined. … If you deceive me, you’ll see what I’ll do with you.”
“It will cost you, you will see what at the end,” Kočner says ominously.
In response, Trnka meekly acknowledges that the businessman had threatened his life: “Well, a bullet. Thirty-two [Slovak] crowns,” he replies. He had gotten the point.
In the same conversation, Kočner mentions funds he kept on Trnka’s behalf. Judging from their conversation, in which they mention the names of two Kočner allies, at least one of whom had an ongoing criminal case, the money may have been intended to buy legal favors.
“No, you never took anything,” Kočner says. “All the money that ended up with me. You never wanted to know how much and for what, and you said that I should hold it. You never asked how much you got there, you always came and said you needed this and that, and I always withdrew [the money] and gave it to you. Is that so?”
“It is,” Trnka replies.
In addition to this audio recording, the newly obtained data contains a video that shows Kočner personally installing a hidden camera in Trnka’s office to record confidential conversations.
In one such undated recording discovered in Kočner’s files, Trnka and Ján Počiatek, then Slovakia’s finance minister, are heard having a sensitive conversation about an ongoing scandal in which Počiatek had approved a controversial payment to settle an intellectual property rights case involving a state firm. Kočner’s possession of this potentially embarrassing recording demonstrates the power he wielded over the prosecutor general.
During the seven years Trnka remained in the post, Kočner was never indicted for any reason, though his involvement in an array of dubious and possibly illegal schemes was subsequently reported using publicly available information.
On one occasion, several prosecutors tried to investigate the businessman for his involvement in a financial fraud known as the Glance House case — only to have their efforts overturned by Trnka. After the prosecutor general was narrowly voted out in 2011, he remained in the office in another position and retained much of his influence.
Trnka could not be reached for comment.
Trnka wasn’t the only official in Slovakia’s judicial system who did Kočner’s bidding.
Data obtained from Kočner’s phones show his influence over a group of several judges at important courts — often the very same courts in which cases involving Kočner were being decided.
It is not clear what kind of leverage Kočner may have had over these judges. But the content of his discussions with some of them on WhatsApp and Threema, another chat service, make the value of these relationships clear.
In one case, he tells Vladimír Sklenka, then the vice president of Bratislava’s First District Court, that he should “come and pick up his Christmas [present].” Later, he tells Sklenka that “the amount 40 has been deposited,” and on another occasion asks the judge whether he has gotten used to his new phone.
On the other side, Sklenka’s position enabled him to review materials related to the second Technopol case — an ongoing suit in which Kočner was involved — and to provide the businessman with step-by-step insights about what his opponents were doing.
On another occasion, Sklenka openly asked Kočner how he should rule in an ongoing case: “And how now? [Should I] grant or dismiss? 🤔”
Monika Jankovská, a judge and deputy justice minister, was similarly high-placed — and similarly intertwined with Kočner. Over the course of eight months, she exchanged over 6,200 messages with him, communicating about his payments to her and other judges for court rulings, discussing ongoing cases, and exchanging kissing emojis.
“I suppose you’re going to split Zuza’s reward also with Denisa [Cviková],” Kočner writes to Jankovská, referring to judges involved in the second Markiza case.
“No, Deni will get part of mine. I promised that cunt something and now I must keep it,” Jankovská replies.
Since Jankovská was highly placed in the Justice Ministry, she was able to use her influence to press the judge in charge of the case, Zuzana Maruniaková (or “Zuza”), to issue a decision favorable to Kočner. Maruniaková did so.
Sklenka resigned in December after his communications with Kočner were made public. Jankovská also resigned from the Ministry of Justice and was later suspended from her position as a judge.
Sklenka could not be reached for comment for this story. Cviková and Maruniaková also could not be reached, and a spokesperson for the Bratislava District Court said they were not available for comment. Jankovská hung up the phone when contacted by reporters.
Kočner’s influence wasn’t limited to top prosecutors and judges.
During the Kuciak murder trial, one of the co-conspirators, Zoltán Andruskó, testified that he had been afraid to report the journalist’s planned murder to police because of Kočner’s extensive connections. Though Andruskó may have been seeking to exculpate himself, there are grounds to believe that Kočner’s influence was real.
One of the businessman’s most powerful friends was Norbert Bödör, a mixed martial arts coach and son of the head of a well-connected private security company. That company, Bonul, made a fortune on public tenders thanks to its close connections with Slovakia’s ruling SMER-SD party. The party’s leader, ex-Prime Minister Robert Fico, was known to attend Bonul’s Christmas parties while in office.
Reporters obtained thousands of messages Kočner and Bödör exchanged in 2017 and 2018. The two men texted each other at least several times a week, discussing sensitive matters such as ongoing police investigations.
Moreover, among the tasks Kočner assigned to Bödör was obtaining personal information about his enemies, including journalists, from police databases.
“Can you please pull the spider [web]?” he asked, referring to a compilation of personal information about his targets, including home addresses, names of children and other family members, and car license plates.
Data obtained from one of Kočner’s USB drives confirms that he eventually received the information he had asked for. The data also shows that Kuciak was among the journalists Kočner was investigating.
The well-connected Bödör would have been in a good position to get Kočner what he needed. He is related to Tibor Gašpar, then the head of the Slovak Police Force, by marriage, and the two families are known to be close. What’s more, a police officer who had been logged accessing the data about Kuciak told investigators that he had done so at Gašpar’s request.
In response to questions, Bödör referred reporters to an earlier interview with SME, a Slovakian daily publication. In that interview, he confirmed that he knew Kočner personally, denied helping him surveil journalists, and expressed disbelief that he could have ordered the double murder. He also confirmed his family relation to Gašpar.
When reached for comment, Gašpar referred reporters to his Facebook page, where no answers had been posted at the time of publication.
Kočner’s techniques for maintaining his influence went beyond bribery. One of his most essential allies was his lover, Alena Zsuzsová. Over a period of several years, she obtained compromising information about high-level politicians, prosecutors, and lawyers for Kočner’s benefit.
Data obtained from one of Kočner’s phones shows that Zsuzsová initiated flirtatious Facebook conversations with people of interest to the businessman.
When they responded, Zsuzsová took the conversations to more private channels such as WhatsApp. Her mode of operation was to send her targets photographs of models with her face photoshopped onto their partially clad bodies, and to request images in return. A number of her victims complied, sending photos that confirmed their positions — such as the deputy speaker of parliament sending a picture with the parliamentary insignia — or even photos of their genitalia. She passed the photos to Kočner, sometimes accompanied by derogatory statements.
“Next willy for your collection,” she texted. “Are you really really sure you want to see it? I need to warn you. I have never seen anything as ugly and disgusting in my life as this one. It made me sick when I saw it….”
In some cases, she made recordings of phone conversations with her targets and sent these to Kočner as well. The information she obtained in this manner included internal information about the functioning of the office of one prosecutor, a married man who, in one recorded conversation, tells her so much that she can hardly get a word in edgewise.
In their own private conversations, Zsuzsová and Kočner refer to their victims as “sheep,” classifying them in groups according to their level of influence. More influential targets would net Zsuzsová higher payments.
“A class-one [sheep] is 30,000 euros and a class-two [sheep] is 10,000,” Zsuzsová confirmed for Kočner’s approval.
Unbeknownst to Kočner, the same Gorilla Case he had discussed with his obedient prosecutor general would set in motion the chain of events that led to his downfall.
When news of the scandal first broke in 2011, the file containing the transcripts of the secret wiretaps became a sensation in the Slovakian media. But perhaps the most devoted reader of the 69-page document was Ján Kuciak, then still a journalism student in Nitra, a small city in western Slovakia.
Instead of working on his bachelor thesis, the young man, then just 21, became obsessed with the affair. He spent hours reading and analyzing the material, doing his best to confirm the details from public sources and publishing his findings. It was this experience that first made him realize how passionate he was about investigative journalism.
Kuciak’s aptitude for the work was quickly recognized by his colleagues. By the fall of 2015, he was invited to join the investigative team of a fledgling Slovakian news website, Aktuality.
The junior investigative reporter soon began to focus on Kočner. In the spring of 2017, he started publishing a series of articles about the businessman’s questionable dealings.
Kuciak’s reporting also raised troubling questions about the failed or closed police investigations into Kočner, and exposed blatant mistakes on the part of police investigators and prosecutors.
More damning still was the fact that, in his reporting, Kuciak relied on public sources, such as the Slovakian business registry, which should have been readily available to law enforcement officials. Some of the alleged crimes he described were carried out during Trnka’s tenure as Slovakia’s top prosecutor.
In the first open confrontation between the reporter and the businessman, Kuciak asked Kočner several technical questions about his businesses at a June 2017 press conference. In response, Kočner lost his temper, telling Kuciak his reporting was “not true” and calling him a liar.
His frustration was perhaps unsurprising. Just a month later, in the wake of growing public pressure spurred by Kuciak’s reporting, a special prosecutor reopened a shuttered investigation into the Donovaly case.
In an ominous sign, Kočner called the young reporter that September and accused him of targeting his family and of writing about him on someone’s orders. Kuciak calmly denied both accusations, but received only threats in response.
“I will start paying special attention to you and your person, your mother, your father and your siblings,” Kočner says. “I guarantee you will stop writing.”
According to his friends, Kuciak was not overly concerned about Kočner’s threat, considering such episodes simply a part of the job. He continued his reporting, publishing further investigations about Kočner in the following months.
Unknown to the young reporter, Kočner was already planning his murder. According to the indictment, it was Zsuzsová, the businessman’s ever-reliable partner, who he asked to organize the hit.
On February 21, 2018, two hit men arrived in Velká Mača, a small village 60 kilometers from Bratislava where Kuciak and his fiancée were renovating a small house. It took three bullets to snuff out both 27-year-olds’ lives. But the story wouldn’t end there — not for Slovakia and not for Kočner.
The Slovakia of 2018 was no longer the wild country it was in the ’90s, when the president’s son could be kidnapped by the state’s own security services. It had been a full-fledged member of the European Union for over a decade, and the murder of a young journalist in retaliation for his work simply wasn’t supposed to happen.
The public reacted within days. Though only a small memorial march was expected on the Friday after the murders, up to 25,000 people flooded the streets of Bratislava. The energy of the march felt not just elegiac, but political.
Since Kuciak had been investigating the infiltration into Slovakia of the dreaded Italian ’Ndrangheta mafia — and its collusion with government officials — many protesters associated his murder with government corruption. They held signs inspired by his work: “Mafia get out of my country,” and “Fico is in bed with the Italian Mafia.” Above all, the public demanded an independent police investigation into the case.
Over the following months, young Slovaks all over the country, in cities large and small, started organizing weekly Friday protests to demand “a decent Slovakia.”
Initially, however, their demand for an impartial investigation remained unmet. Government officials and Tibor Gašpar, the chief of police, produced numerous and puzzling theories about the murders. These included suggestions that the killings had been the work of drug addicts, that they had been motivated by romantic jealousy, and even that Martina, and not Ján, had been the real target.
One occurance attracted more outrage during the investigation than anything else. Shortly after the bodies were discovered, reporters from TV JOJ spotted Robert Krajmer, a head of the anti-corruption unit of the Slovak National Criminal Agency, at the scene of the crime.
His presence was puzzling, since Krajmer’s remit was corruption and financial crime, not forensic murder investigations. What’s more, after being asked about the reason for Krajmer’s presence, police president Gašpar vehemently denied that he had been there at all. Only after being confronted with a video recording did Gašpar admit that Krajmer had been in the area — though he still denied that he had visited the crime scene itself.
In response, TV JOJ reporters produced another video clip that clearly showed Krajmer entering Kuciak’s yard. After this episode, subsequent protests included calls for Gašpar’s resignation. Still, authorities have never offered a clear explanation for Krajmer’s presence at the crime scene.
Krajmer hung up the phone when contacted by reporters for comment.
Soon, the public pressure began to take its toll.
Within a span of several weeks in March 2018, the interior minister and Prime Minister Fico resigned. The following month, the new interior minister, as well as Gašpar, the police chief, both tendered their resignations. Two police investigators also left their positions; Kuciak’s reporting had named them both as having closed investigations into Kočner.
After these changes in leadership, the murder investigation picked up steam.
In June, the police arrested and detained Kočner in connection with the second Markiza case, charging him with offenses related to forgery.
Judging from a note smuggled out of prison from Kočner complaining about a ruling by Judge Mojmír Mamojka not to release him on bail, the businessman was still expecting help from the top. “Why did Mamojka fail!!! … R.F. was supposed to fix it!” he wrote, possibly referring to former Prime Minister Robert Fico. “I want to know why he screwed it up.”
But Kočner’s old tactics no longer appeared to work. He has remained in police custody since his arrest.
That October, a key trove of evidence was handed to police by Peter Tóth, a former Kočner confidant with his own mysterious history (see box).
Perhaps the most mysterious figure in Kočner’s world is Peter Tóth, once a prominent investigative journalist. His life has been intertwined with Kočner’s since the first Technopol case in the ’90s, when Tóth’s groundbreaking reporting related many of the sensational details to the public.
Though his star as a journalist was rising, Tóth made an abrupt career change in 1998, quitting the media business and joining the Slovak Information Service. He later headed the agency’s Internal Intelligence Section, Tóth told local outlets.
Toth was fired from the service in 2005, allegedly for criticizing a public official. Later he began working for Kočner as a freelance private investigator and confidant. One of his tasks, according to his own testimony in the murder case, was to conduct surveillance and collect compromising information about journalists, including Kuciak.
After the murders, Tóth asked Kočner whether he was responsible for them. Though the businessman denied it, the evidence of his involvement kept mounting.
Finally, Tóth decided to act. In October 2018, he loaded his car with some of the sensitive items Kočner had asked him to keep — including the businessman’s golden Bentley-edition iPhone, documents and contracts, and even diamonds — and handed them over to the police.
The information and evidence Tóth gave police forms the basis of many of the revelations detailed in this report.
Tóth’s motives for betraying Kočner remain unclear. When reached by reporters, he declined to comment for this story.
Days later, alleged co-conspirators Miroslav Marček, Tomáš Szabó, and Zoltán Andruskó — as well as Kočner’s lover, Alena Zsuzsová — were taken into custody.
Andruskó, a pizzeria operator, was the first to cooperate with police. Finally, in March 2019, the once untouchable businessman was charged with ordering the murder.
In the end, it was Kuciak’s brutal killing — and the subsequent public outrage — that jolted Slovakia’s justice system into action. This January, a man who had cheated that system for decades faced off against a judge in perhaps the most closely watched trial in the country’s history.
With additional reporting by Eva Kubaniova.