Latvian Bank Was Laundering Tool

Banking records obtained by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) indicate that the Latvian bank Trasta Komercbanka was the final destination for billions of dollars that left Russia in a massive money laundering scheme.

In each case found by OCCRP and investigated by Moldovan anti-money laundering police, two UK-based-but-offshore-owned companies signed what police say were bogus loan contracts.

Here’s how police say the scheme worked:

Trasta Komercbanka is one of the oldest private banks in Latvia. It was founded under the name Riga Bank in 1989 but in 1995 changed its name to Trasta Komercbanka.

The bank initially offered banking services as well as loans to companies and investment services. After the Russian financial crisis of 1997 the bank changed its mode of operation and, in 2000, began specializing in serving VIP clients. The bank has offices in Belarus, Ukraine, Russia, Kazakhstan, Canada, and Bulgaria as well as in Cyprus.

Trasta Komercbanka was one of six Latvian banks used in the Sergey Magnitsky case.

OCCRP sent Trasta a set of questions regarding the money-laundering operations but a bank spokesperson replied that the bank cannot comment on the case. It has not been charged with any illegal activities although it has been involved in other cases where money laundering was alleged.

Related stories

Bombardier’s Azerbaijani Partner Has Chickens and Cows. Who Got the Millions?

Trans-Signal-Rabita, an Azerbaijani company, came out of nowhere to score a huge deal: A US$ 56.8 million share of a larger project with Swedish engineering giant Bombardier Transportation to install signaling equipment for Azerbaijan’s state-owned railway company. But when OCCRP reporters tracked down its owner, they found only a rural electrician living in a remote village near the Iranian border.

The Russian Laundromat Exposed

Three years after the “Laundromat” was exposed as a criminal financial vehicle to move vast sums of money out of Russia, journalists now know how the complex scheme worked -- including who ended up with the $20.8 billion and how, despite warnings, banks failed for years to shut it down.